When we talk of equations we talk of balancing them or proving them and this thing to say we are taught right from class 5 onwards...we must have been genius in it until now. Isn’t it?

Now if we compare the two equations i.e. the gujjars and the women! What? really?...are they comparable?

Well, I say yes (see, don’t we and the politicians often talk of bringing the other classes equivalent of the society!) history supports me in saying that before independence in developed nations, neither women nor any other caste where given reservations.

So it comes round in India as…

Before independence:-
Women= no reservations, gujjars= reservations (untouchables)

After independence:-
Women= no reservations, gujjars= reservations (O.B.C - since 1952)

After 60 years of independence
Women= still no reservations, gujjars= fighting for even more reservation!

Condition in these years:-

Before independence
Women = gujjars = bad condition, low standard of living

After independence:-
Gujjars = worst conditions. Women = still more worst conditions

After 60 years of independence:-
Gujjars = apt conditions. Women = being compared and considered equal to men!

Now, how come women who are still fighting for reservations are in a better condition and the strong willed, heavily muscled gujjars are in a not-so-upholsted position? We know that, it is the inner feeling of achievement, the inner push of a vow to do something, which provoked the women to pass and surpass the gujjars. Didn’t the gujjars noticed that in spite of the fact that she’s still rebuked in the parliament by those who wish to “help one and help all” for the 33% reservation grant…outside the honorable place…the same people puke and see them as a potential threat when in front of the honorable chair.

Keeping in mind that until now the gujjars are included in the OBC genre (which means that they are more privileged than the women) are they really not taking on the view that by having sheer will and determination (and not reservation!) the women are where they wanted to be.

The equations above just show the status of both, that none have been privileged enough. If talking of gujjars we talk of a community were both men and women are present. Is it not there responsibility that they see to their community as a child who has to be taken care of as women has taken of herself? It is not necessary to always look up to government for each and every problem which sprouts up in locality or to cry and to throw tantrums like a child not taken care of. Should see the women’s actually, or better think of the women who ultimately take care of all no one cared for her up till now. But still she cared for all, she studied facing hurdles and finally built a niche for herself in the society isn’t it?

The government in the eyes of a teenager is a mere service provider. They think the only thing that bugs its service providing capacity is the human controlled manipulation work. Otherwise to them it seems as a paying, non responsive, argument provoking, joke able piece of institution. So, how come gujjars and even the women are so much relying on the government to do good to them. When we can control things better then why to drop tears on the waterproofed shoulder. It should be remembered that never had any institution held back the forms just because they were marked S.C/S.T/gujjars or OBC and yes neither women. So it would be unfair to say that no opportunity is being given to any of the “equation statements”.

Yes, but as earlier said that those who know how to make hay when the sun shines only resides with a glitter under it.

Or as goes the Darwin’s theory…so very rehearsed...time and again…

“Survival of the fittest”

So in the end we see that the two statements which I was meticulously trying to equate or to say proving could not be equated. Because some or the other way pushing yourself pays…hence proved!